Would you buy a can of paint in the fresh produce section of your grocery store?


Several months ago, I received an invitation to  take part in an online focus group for a well-known electronics retailer. I like shopping at their stores and have also been happy to buy from them online with great satisfaction. So, the marketing nerd in me readily signed up to give my point of view.

Well, last week I completed their latest questionnaire about my shopping habits and what type of products I have historically purchased online. I won’t bore you with the intimate details of my shopping habits but I have scored significant deals on shoes, vitamins and my favourite perfume by using diverse retailers.

The questionnaire delved into my online buying habits and asked if any of those purchases were from  U.S websites.  The company also wanted to know if price, breadth of merchandise or a better returns policy had impacted my decisions?  I answered “yes” to all of them.  Now, here is the question that left me scratching my head.  Would I consider buying those same non-electronic items from this electronic retailer via their store or online.  And if the company did expand their products beyond electronics would I see that as a negative?  In fact, I actually wondered why a focus group was being asked to comment on that type of strategic business decision.

The decision to add new product lines where there is no common thread requires a thoughtful consideration of various factors including the financial and logistical. A diversification strategy can really put a strain on your company and credibility. If there are untapped opportunities for your business, and ultimately your customers, the addition of new products makes sense.

A quick scan of the North American retail landscape shows a lot of players.  Amazon is arguably  the most successful pure-play online company in the world successfully selling digital products alongside cosmetics, shoes, clothing and garden tools. In addition to great customer service and an easy return policy, Amazon’s success is ultimately based on reducing their overhead and selling to consumers more often that not at a lower price.  Consumers get that.  That same business model has also allowed Wholesale Clubs such as Costco and Sam’s Club to also offer a wide product mix.  And department stores are also accepted for selling “everything” under one roof albeit not always at the best price .  So, if there are many retailers selling a product mix, why did I hold this particular electronics retailer to a different standard?  Can consumers perceive a product differently depending upon the retailer?  Is that why some companies are able to sell a range of disparate products with credibility and others fall short of the mark.

It takes time, money and the ability to consistently deliver on your promise to build your brand.  So, if you have invested in becoming the destination for all things “electronic” the addition of new products outside your core become a distraction. Would you actually buy a can of paint if it  was on display in the fresh produce section of  a supermarket?  Although it would be convenient to centralize my shopping in one place I still would not do it.  And  I suspect unless there was a good reason, most grocers would be equally resistant.

The Devil is in the details


As a loyalty and valued customer, I received an e-mail last week informing me about my point standings, advertising new offers and an opportunity to “Enter To Win” a unique professional hockey experience.  This particular company is a huge player in the travel industry with an enormous brand footprint in the marketplace.  I saw they were offering the opportunity to win a lifetime experience to attend a hockey event in another city.  This particular company is a sponsor of hockey in Canada and had in fact taken an aggressive and public stand against  excessive violence after the rash of head concussions last year.  I thought the promotion was a great link between their brand and sponsorship activities.

The Promo Nerd in me avidly read the contest rule and regulations to learn more about the prizing.  I was completely shocked to read the Grand Prize only included entrance into the event, but did not include the travel, accommodations, nor spending money to get there. Why would they offer a partial prize and limit it only to consumers who could afford about $3,000.00 for two people to enjoy the experience. To truly be a winner, you needed to have the extra cash and a willingness to spend it.  I found the prizing description equally shocking considering the company is in the travel industry.  When I first started creating consumer promotions,  I learned you should never require a winner to be out-of-pocket in order to claim their prize. Otherwise, it was not truly a prize. Did this company create prizing hoping the winner would book air and hotel reservations with them?  And what about a minimal level of spending money while the winner was away? Eating for two is not cheap over the course of a weekend.

I decided to post my comments on their Facebook page to see the company’s response. The  company correctly provided full disclosure of the contest and accurately described what was being awarded.  My beef was about the prizing.  I just thought it was poor form.  WeIl, I thought the response to my posting was in equally poor form.  I was thanked for my concerns and informed “my comments had been duly noted”.

Was I offside in my comments? Let me know what you think?

Hello world!


Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.